Legal Opinion

King County v. Superior Court for King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1939No. 27626. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

May 8, 1939, Russell H. Fluent, Jack Taylor, and Tom Smith, the duly elected, qualified, and acting county commissioners of King county, Washington, petitioners herein, awarded to the Washington Commonwealth Federation the contract for the county printing, for the period beginning July 1, 1939, and ending June 30, 1940.

May 23d, C. W. Malcolm, as plaintiff, filed his complaint before the superior court, alleging that he was a resident and taxpayer of King county, and that he instituted his action on his own behalf and on behalf of all other taxpayers of King county similarly situated and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Lynn v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Puget Sound Publishing Co. v. Times Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Times Printing Co. v. Star Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Recall of BoldtWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Edwards v. City Council of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Thayer v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Daily Journal of Commerce, Inc. v. Daily Journal Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. In re Recall of BoldtWashington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API