SIBILIA v. Makita Corp.

ORDER

JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. 9) and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 10). The Court, having considered the motion, response, and being otherwise advised in the premises, concludes that the motion should be denied.

DISCUSSION

Plaintiff Mark Sibilia (“Plaintiff’) originally filed this action in state court, alleging causes of action pursuant to Florida law for personal injuries suffered because of an alleged defective product manufactured and sold by…