Eubanks v. Hirschbach Motor Lines
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION HARRY EUBANKS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:22-cv-411-JSM-PRL EROL E. HALL and HIRSCHBACK MOTOR LINES, INC., Defendants. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. 7) and Defendants’ Response in Opposition (Dkt. 8). The Court, upon review of the motion, response, and being otherwise advised in the premises, concludes that the motion should be denied because the “other paper” Defendants relied upon to support the removal unambiguously establishes the amount in controversy. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Roe v. Michelin North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Bender v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.