Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
KLINE, J.,* Dissenting.
The majority’s allowance of setoff—which elevates the economic interests of reinsurers over the legislatively preferred and *1145equitably superior rights of policyholders, injured claimants and other creditors—results from a fundamental misunderstanding of the insurance insolvency statutes and contravenes clear legislative intent.
Permitting reinsurer setoff will result in the disallowance of many justifiable claims and have a ruinous effect on many individual policyholders, who reasonably believed they were protected against injury. As a consequence, policyholders, injured…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.