Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1992No. S014036Published

1Dissent

KLINE, J.,* Dissenting.

The majority’s allowance of setoff—which elevates the economic interests of reinsurers over the legislatively preferred and *1145equitably superior rights of policyholders, injured claimants and other creditors—results from a fundamental misunderstanding of the insurance insolvency statutes and contravenes clear legislative intent.

Permitting reinsurer setoff will result in the disallowance of many justifiable claims and have a ruinous effect on many individual policyholders, who reasonably believed they were protected against injury. As a consequence, policyholders, injured…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API