Legal Opinion

Caudill v. Mrs. Grissom's Salads, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

Plaintiff’s complaint against defendants for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident concluded with a prayer seeking compensatory damages of $225,-000 and demanding a jury to try the cause. Twenty-six (26) days later, prior to any responsive pleading, plaintiff filed an amendment deleting the last paragraph of the complaint and inserting a new paragraph wherein compensatory damages in the sum of $260,000 were sought with no reference to a jury demand.

The case was docketed as a jury case, was set for trial in the manner and upon a day set aside for jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Silcox v. Smith CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  2. Warren v. Grocery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brian Elkins v. Rex Berry & William BolinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Hartwell v. LumpkinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
  3. P. Robert Philp, Jr. v. Southeast Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  4. Smith v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. Smith v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API