Legal Opinion

Parks v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 15, 1841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ray county. The defendants contend that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to their plea as aforesaid. See 1 Story Equ. 321 — 2; the People v. Janson, 7 J. R. 332, and Pain v. Pack-ford, 13 J. R. 174.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Scott, Judge.

This was an action of debt on a collector’s bond, in which judgment was obtained by the State against the appellants. The appellants, in February, 1836, became securities for William Mauzey, as collector of Ray county, and with him entered into bond to the State of Missouri, with the conditions prescribed by law. The declaration avers as a breach of the condition of the bond, that Mauzey, in February, 1S37, and before and since that time received large sums of money, for which he failed to account. Thd appellants pleaded nil debet, non est factum,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Scheble v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ray County ex rel. Common School Fund v. BentleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Jennings v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API