Legal Opinion

Hager v. Tire Recyclers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 29, 1995No. 9211-08008; CA A82492PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Defendant Groat Brothers, Inc. (Groat) moves for reconsideration of our opinion, 136 Or App 439, 901 P2d 948 (1995), in which we held that the trial court erred in entering a directed verdict in favor of Groat on plaintiffs’ claim for intentional trespass. We grant the motion, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.

We state only a brief summary of the relevant facts. Plaintiffs complained that Groat committed intentional trespass when, by removing waste tires from property upstream from plaintiffs’ land, it caused 263 tons of silt to flow onto plaintiffs’ property. Groat asserted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hager v. Tire Recyclers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marlow v. City of SistersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. EndicottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Robert Lloyd Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local Union 16Oregon Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API