Lederman v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WILLIAM P. GRAY, District Judge.
This action was filed in the Califorhia Superior Court and removed here by the defendant citing the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) and § 1441(a). The plaintiff moves for remand to the state court. For reasons herein set forth, such motion will be granted.
The plaintiff is a “participant” under a group major medical plan (the plan) established by Mr. Lederman’s employer in conjunction with other members of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. It has been stipulated that the plan is an “employee welfare benefit plan”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cate v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- The Emma GilesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
3Cited by19 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Robert C. Chilton v. Savannah Foods & Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Duffy v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Home for Crippled Children v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Arthur Taylor v. General Motors Corporation, and Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.