Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pangan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2000No. 981694PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice:

¶ 1 This case is before us on certification from the United States District Court for the District of Utah Central Division. The federal court has asked this court to rule on the following two questions of Utah law:

As a matter of Utah state law is it possible for the intentional tort of battery to be within the scope of a person’s employment, and if it is possible for battery to be within the scope of one’s employment, what test is to be employed to determine whether the battery was within the scope of employment.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In July 1996, Clark and Pangan…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hardeman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Clancy v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Aguila v. Planned Parenthood of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API