Legal Opinion

Chick Transit Corp. v. Edenton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 28, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Ray A. Edenton, administrator of the estate of Willis Deavers, deceased, instituted an action against the Chick Transit Corporation and Banks Wade to recover damages for the wrongful death of Deavers which occurred when an automobile that he was driving was in collision with the truck of the Chick Transit Corporation, which was being driven by Banks Wade. The result of the trial was a verdict and judgment in favor of the administrator against both defendants for $10,000.

The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court approving it compel us, under well established rules, *364to consider the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Cheatwood's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Ratcliffe v. McDonald's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Pocahontas Colleries Co. v. Rukas' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Wood's Administratrix v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. R & T INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Matthews v. Hicks, Adm'r.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Cooke v. GriggsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  4. Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
  5. K.E.F.V. v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API