Legal Opinion

People v. Uhrey

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael A. Gary, J.

Defendant has filed an omnibus motion, dated February 27, 1996, asking the court for various relief. The People have filed a written response, dated May 8, 1996.

Grand Jury Minutes

Defendant’s motion to inspect the Grand Jury minutes is granted to the extent of the court examining them in camera. Defendant’s further motion to dismiss and/or reduce the charges in the indictment is decided as follows.

*1017Defendant is charged in the indictment with one count of perjury in the first degree (Penal Law § 210.15), based on evidence before the Grand Jury of two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. BevilacquaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altieri v. HoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. Panaro, New York County Courts2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API