Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Blacknall v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1988No. 85-1358Published

1ConcurrenceSchwelb, Associate Judge

It is troubling, at least to me, that coverage under the rent control laws can be avoided, and the tenants’ rent can be almost tripled,1 by conveying the premises from mother to daughter for the princely sum of $10.00.2 In situations which appear to me to be analogous in principle, transfers between family members are treated as suspect and are subject to special scrutiny by the courts, especially where no consideration has been paid. See C.I.R. v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 291, 66 S.Ct. 532, 537, 90 L.Ed. 670 (1946); Sence v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 67, 394 F.2d 842, 852 (1968) (avoidance of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Shauer v. AltertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. United States v. Real Estate Development CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1972
  5. Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API