Legal Opinion
Ed. McKean Oldsmobile Co. v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1962No. Appeals, Nos. 37, 38, 48 and 49PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
In Pittsburgh the Oldsmobile Division of the General Motors Corporation has established what is known as a Car Locator System, that is to say, in a certain *108office a file of cards is maintained with a description of every Oldsmobile automobile available for sale by all the dealers in the Pittsburgh Zone, which covers half of Pennsylvania, and part of West Virginia, Ohio and Maryland. Under this system any Oldsmobile dealer who does not have the particular car which a prospective customer is seeking asks the Oldsmobile Zone Office if that car is in stock in any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Christian Education v. Philadelphia School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Philadelphia School District v. Frankford Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth v. McKinley-Gregg Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Beaver County Cooperative Association's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shelburne Sportswear, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kungsgaten, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. Penn Center House, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Tax Review Board v. Automatic Plating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kungsgaten, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965