H. J. Heinz Co. v. School District
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
H. J. Heinz Company, appellee, maintains an Employes Service Building in connection with its extensive plant in Pittsburgh. As a part of the service there provided it operates three dining rooms or cafeterias with a total seating capacity of about 1,800. These dining rooms are maintained primarily for the convenience and benefit of employes of the company. The prices paid by employes for food are lower than the charges in comparable commercial restaurants. From this service the company seeks to recover only the direct costs of the food and the labor related to preparing and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Phipps v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Wellslboro Hotel Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Ferguson v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Biscuit Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Shelburne Sportswear, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Philadelphia School District v. Frankford Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Graybar Electric Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Mellon Square Garage, Inc. v. Public Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.