State v. Rogers
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the common law year-and-a-day rule is currently a viable principle of criminal law in Tennessee. The defendant argued in the Court of Criminal Appeals that his conviction for second degree murder should be set aside because the victim’s death did not occur within a year and one day of the fatal stab wounds. The Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the defendant’s argument and affirmed his conviction upon finding that the common law year-and-a-day rule was abolished by the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PearsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. FarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Van Tran v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.