Legal Opinion
Ost v. Collection Bureau, Inc.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided April 29, 1980No. A1-79-108, A1-79-115, A1-79-123, A1-79-131 and A1-79-197PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
Cross motions for partial summary judgment were filed in Civil No. A1-79-197, which had been consolidated with the other cases included in this title. Thereafter the other litigants joined in the cross motions.
The resolution of the motions turns on the question of whether the form letters and notice used by the Defendants as debt collectors comply with the requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq.
Section 809 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692g, applies to the validation of debts and requires:
“(a) Within five days…
2Cited by21 opinions
- George Wilson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Quadramed Corporation, George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- James A. Swanson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Southern Oregon Credit Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lenvil Miller v. Payco-General American Credits, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Masuda v. Thomas Richards & Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1991
- Gaetano v. Payco of Wisconsin, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.