Legal Opinion
Sandisk Corp. v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 9, 2012No. 2011-1346PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
SanDisk Corporation (“Sandisk”) sued Kingston Technology Co., Inc. and Kingston Technology Corp. (collectively “Kingston”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,719,808 (“'808 patent”), 6,149,316 (“'316 Patent”), 6,426,893 (“'893 patent”), 6,757,-842 (“'842 patent”), and 6,763,424 (“'424 patent”). After the district court issued its claim construction opinion, SanDisk withdrew its infringement claims with respect to the '808 and '893 patents…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. KG v. Fujifilm Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Simo Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong Ucloudlink NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Eagle Pharm., Inc. v. Slayback Pharma LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.