Legal Opinion
Brennan v. Carrasco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 1976No. 75-1443PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TRASK, Circuit Judge.
In this action the Secretary of Labor sought to enjoin the defendants-appellants *455from violating the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act1 and to restrain the continued withholding of back wages to their employees under the Act.
After a hearing on cross motions for summary judgment based on a Joint Statement of Facts, the trial court upheld the Secretary’s position that appellants’ business was a covered “enterprise” within the meaning of Section 3(s)(l) of the Act and that it was therefore required to comply with overtime provisions.2 Judgment was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rural Fire Protection Company, a Corporation v. William E. HeppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Dooley Bros., Inc., Herbert Kletjian, D/B/A University Cleaning Co. v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- George P. Schultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Instant Handling, Inc., and Joseph E. King, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Samuel G. Saghatelian, Individually, and Dba Valley BakeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Metropolitan Trash, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MorseMontana Supreme Court · 1987
- Brennan v. CarrascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Carter v. JAI-PUT Enterprise Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020