Legal Opinion
Juniper Development Group v. Kahn
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 4, 1993No. 92-1040, 92-1095, 92-1289 and 92-1290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Circuit Judge.
The bankruptcy court disallowed the contingent claim Jumper Development Group (“Juniper”) filed against the consolidated chapter 7 estate of Hemingway Transport, Inc. (“Hemingway”) and Bristol Terminals, Inc. (“Bristol”) for anticipated response costs for the removal and remediation of hazardous substances discovered on property previously purchased by Juniper from the Hemingway-Bristol chapter 11 estate. Juniper’s companion claim for cleanup-related attorney fees was disallowed as well. The district court affirmed and Juniper appeals. The chapter 7 trustee (“trustee”)…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- In Re Mammoth Mart, Inc., Debtor. Stanley Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc., (Two Cases) in Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc., in Re Hemingway Transport, Inc., Debtors. Juniper Development Group, Etc. v. Herbert C. Kahn, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994