Legal Opinion

Austin Powder Company v. Billy Keith Stacy

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2017No. 2016 SC 000347Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

|MPORTANT NOT|CE NOT TO BE PUBL|SHED OP|N|ON TH|S OP|N|ON lS DES|GNATED ”NOT TO BE PUBL|SHED." PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF ClV|L PROCEDURE PROMULGATED BY THE SUPREME COURT, CR 76.28(4)(€), TH|S OP|N|ON IS NOT TO BE PUBL|SHED AND SHALL NOT BE ClTED OR USED AS B|ND|NG PRECEDENT |N ANY OTHER CASE lN ANY_COURT OF TH|S STATE; HOWEVER, UNPUBL|SHED KENTUCKY APPELLATE DEC|S|ONS, RENDERED AFTER JANUARY 1, 2003, MAY BE ClTED FOR CONS|DERAT|ON BY THE COURT lF THERE lS NO PUBL|SHED OP|N|ON THAT WOULD ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE lSSUE BEFORE THE COURT. OPIN|ONS ClTED FOR CONS|DERAT|ON BY THE COURT SHALL BE SET…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paramount Foods, Inc. v. BurkhardtKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ira A. Watson Department Store v. HamiltonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Caudill v. Maloney's Discount StoresKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Smyzer v. BF Goodrich Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  5. Whittaker v. RowlandKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API