Alford v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LAMAR, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This appeal presents a case of first impression and requires us to interpret the “spousal impoverishment” provisions of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 (MCCA), codified at 42 U.S.Code Section 1396r-5 (2006). Specifically, this Court must determine whether our state courts have subject matter jurisdiction over petitions requesting relief under Chapter 42 of the United States Code, Section 1396r-5, prior to a determination of Medicaid eligibility. Finding that the chancery court did not have jurisdiction, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. BlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Schmidt v. Catholic Diocese of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Allred v. WebbMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Sartin v. Barlow Ex Rel. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
- Everitt v. LovittMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vansach v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In re Estate of Vansach)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Pierce v. PierceMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. Hinds CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
- Dale Patrick Miller v. Jessica Dawn SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Lafayette County Board of Supervisors v. Third Circuit Drug CourtMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.