Legal Opinion

Alford v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2010No. 2008-CA-01984-SCTPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal presents a case of first impression and requires us to interpret the “spousal impoverishment” provisions of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 (MCCA), codified at 42 U.S.Code Section 1396r-5 (2006). Specifically, this Court must determine whether our state courts have subject matter jurisdiction over petitions requesting relief under Chapter 42 of the United States Code, Section 1396r-5, prior to a determination of Medicaid eligibility. Finding that the chancery court did not have jurisdiction, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. BlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Schmidt v. Catholic Diocese of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Allred v. WebbMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sartin v. Barlow Ex Rel. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Everitt v. LovittMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vansach v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In re Estate of Vansach)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Pierce v. PierceMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  3. PRECISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. Hinds CountyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  4. Dale Patrick Miller v. Jessica Dawn SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lafayette County Board of Supervisors v. Third Circuit Drug CourtMississippi Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API