Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. McCall

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 29, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

The principal issue on appeal is whether plaintiff may properly utilize the courts to recover for mining work performed without first obtaining a permit in accordance with T.C.A., § 59-8-205.1

In the summer of 1979, the plaintiff at the direction of Robert Anderson, a mining operator, performed excavation work on lands which Anderson represented as his leasehold. Plaintiff constructed a road into the site and removed the earth covering a vein of coal but discontinued his activities when a reclamation inspector with the Office of Surface Mining issued a cease and desist…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gene Taylor & Sons Plumbing Co. Inc. v. Corondolet Real. TrustTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Serv-U-Mart, Inc. v. Sullivan CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Lones v. Blount County Beer BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Farmer v. FarmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Bancorpsouth Bank v. Justin Herter & Capitol Management, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
  4. Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API