Legal Opinion

People v. Skinner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2018No. 152448; No. 153081; No. 153345PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, C.J.

**96*295At issue here is whether MCL 769.25 violates the Sixth Amendment because it allows the decision whether to impose a sentence of life without **97parole to be made by a judge, rather than by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We hold that MCL 769.25 does not violate the Sixth Amendment because neither the statute nor the Eighth Amendment requires a judge to find any particular fact before imposing life without parole; instead, life without parole is authorized by the jury's verdict alone. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals in Skinner and affirm the part of Hyatt…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Jones v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. People of Michigan v. William Lawrence RuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  4. Curtis Walker v. Dan CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  5. State v. GulleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API