Legal Opinion

Uintah & White River Bands of Ute Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1957No. 47569PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

This is a suit against the United States by the Uintah and White River Bands of Ute Indians. They assert, and the Government denies, that this court has jurisdiction of the case under the special Ute Jurisdictional Act of June 28, 1938, as amended.1 By section 1 of that Act this court is authorized to “hear, determine, and render final judgment on all legal and equitable claims of whatsoever nature which the Ute Indians or any tribe or band or any constituent band thereof, may have against the United States, including, * * * claims arising under or growing out of any treaty or agreement of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. Creek NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. Alcea Band of TillamooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Alcea Band of Tillamooks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Rogue River Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hagen v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. The Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
  4. Tlingit & Haida Indians of Alaska v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. State v. PerankUtah Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API