Legal Opinion
Joshua M. Moore v. Marty Jackley, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Dakota; Ernest Thompson, in his official capacity as Deputy Attorney General of South Dakota
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 3, 2026No. 4:25-cv-04191Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA M. MOORE, 4:25-CV-04191-ECS Plaintiff, vs. MARTY JACKLEY, in his official capacity as |} ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECUSE Attorney General of South Dakota; ERNEST THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Deputy Attorney General of South Dakota, Defendants. Plaintiff, Joshua Moore, moves for recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Doc. 6. Moore alleges that an “appearance of partiality” exists because this Court and Attorney General Marty Jackley are both named as defendants in a separate civil case, and because of prior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carol J. Pope, Gwen G. Caranchini v. Federal Express Corporation Danny R. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Dallas Fletcher and Katherine Fletcher v. Conoco Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.