Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as the company, defendants in error as plaintiffs, and their deceased son as John.
On a portion of the company’s irrigation reservoir and outlet ditch was a so-called “false bank,” composed of ice, covered by blown sand. The condition occurred annually. As the ice melted this bank weakened and finally gave way. Thus, while playing thereon, John, then seven years of age, was precipitated into the water and drowned. Claiming under sections 6303 and 6304, page 1646', C. L. 1921, plaintiffs sued the company for $5,000 damages for that death, which they…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Smith v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Smith v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mile High Fence Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Phipps v. MitzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Denver Tramway Corp. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- City & County of Denver v. StutzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.