Lesocovich v. 180 Madison Avenue Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Levine, J. (dissenting).
We respectfully dissent. In our view, the deposition testimony of Beth Van Demark and of Frank Commisso, a principal stockholder in defendant, sufficiently raised triable issues of fact to preclude summary judgment against plaintiff Michael W. Lesocovich (hereinafter plaintiff). Van Demark was a 23-year-old, unmarried nursery school teacher at the time of the accident. She and another young, single, employed adult woman had leased the second floor apartment in defendant’s building. The entire building consisted of a one-story wing and a three-story wing. The first…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ritto v. GoldbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.