Legal Opinion
Ritto v. Goldberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1970PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
By leasing a specific room in the premises to defendants, doing business as H. B. H. Metered Machine Co., to conduct an automatic washing machine business, the landlord surrendered the right of occupancy of the demised premises to the tenants arid reserved no control over the instruments used by those tenants in their business.
The lease, in terms, gave the lessees “ exclusive use of the aforementioned room ’ ’ except for access to utility meters. Title to *889the washing machines remained with the lessees who could remove them “ at the expiration of this lease ”.
The provisions of section 78 of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- De Clara v. Barber Steamship Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Fleming v. OppelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by43 opinions
- Alnashmi v. Certified Analytical Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Gronski v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Butler v. RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hecht v. Vanderbilt AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Mercer v. Hellas Glass Works Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.