Legal Opinion

Garrigan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 14, 1908No. 1,341PublishedCited by 30 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff in error, Daniel Garrigan, was adjudged by the Circuit Court guilty of contempt, in the violation of an injunctional order issued by that court, in aiding and abetting the parties enjoined and interfering with the business and employes under the protection of such order, and the proceedings and judgment are brought for review by this writ of error.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff in error, Daniel Garrigan, was adjudged by the Circuit Court guilty of contempt, in the violation of an injunctional order issued by that court, in aiding and abetting the parties enjoined and interfering with the business and employes under the protection of such order, and the proceedings and judgment are brought for review by this writ of error. The judgment recites the proceedings and findings and reads as follows; “It appearing to the court that on April 28,…

1Opinion of the CourtSeaman, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiff in error was not a party to the bill filed by the Employers’ Teaming Company for injunctional relief, nor a member of either of the associations named as defendants therein, nor named in the re*19straining order whereof violation is averred in these contempt proceedings, and neither averment nor proof appears of his relation to or privity with either of the parties enjoined, prior to or apart from the alleged acts in violation and contempt of such order. Thus the proceedings and conviction which are brought for review under this writ of error are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Matter of Christensen Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Berger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Mechanic v. GruensfelderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. City of Culver City v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Alice v. Herrlein v. Thomas E. Kanakis and Teklad, Inc., the Mogul Corporation, Nonparty-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API