Legal Opinion

Dunbier v. Mengedoht

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1930No. 27109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, District Judge.

This action was commenced in the district court for Douglas county, by Augustus W. Dunbier, as plaintiff against Carl Mengedoht, William Mengedoht, Bertha Mengedoht, Max Rapp, and Elsie Rapp, as defendants, to recover damages for the alleged intentional and malicious alienation of the affections of his wife, Augusta A. Dun-bier. The defendants, appellants, are the two brothers, stepmother, brother-in-law, and sister of the wife of plaintiff, appellee. Trial was had to a jury and a verdict returned against all of the defendants, assessing plaintiff’s damages at $5,000.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Frost v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  3. Salistean v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ratcliffe v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  5. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. ShoemakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ashby v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Trebelhorn v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kline v. Metcalfe Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Baltzly v. GruenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Treptow Co. v. Duncan Aviation, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API