Legal Opinion

Gladding, McBean & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 4, 1951No. 48917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

In this case we must determine just compensation for tin oxide requisitioned from plaintiff by defendant. The problem is not so difficult as it has been in many cases presented to us since World War II.

In many cases arising out of transactions during that war the Government has insisted that the ceiling price established by the Office of Price Administration was the measure of just compensation. While recognizing the evidentiary value of the determination of this agency, we nevertheless rejected it as controlling. Arkansas Valley Railway, Inc. v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 240, cert. den.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. John J. Felin & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  4. John J. Felin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Coombs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Pueblo v. Sociedad McCormickSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API