Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2000No. 97-71047PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge BOOCHEVER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

We decide whether a successor employer has a duty to bargain with an incumbent union before unilaterally imposing terms when the employer hires its initial workforce from the ranks of a represented bargaining unit of its predecessor.

I — I

Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc., (“ASI”) manufactures structural body components used in the aerospace industry at a facility in Gardena, California. Prior to ASI’s tenure, Aero Stretch, Inc. (“Aero”) engaged in the same operations at the same site. Aero and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Diablo Landscape Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretch Forming International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Advanced Stretchforming International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API