Whittenberg v. Carnegie
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Prom summary judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal, contending that the pleadings and the affidavits supporting the motion for summary judgment and opposing affidavit of merits give rise to controverted questions of fact for determination by the court or a jury. The mere existence of issues of fact is, however, no bar to entry of summary judgment for defendants, if, upon resolving all such issues in favor of plaintiffs, the defendants would still be entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Jones v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 253 Mich 515.
'■ Plaintiffs’ declaration alleges that defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Jones v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Lister v. SakwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Pinch v. MorfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kuhn v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Rogowski v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- General Motors Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Grettenberger Pharmacy, Inc. v. BLUE CROSS-BLUE SHIELDMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Klug v. Berkley Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.