Legal Opinion

Willis v. Jonson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Stites

Reversing.

The question involved on this appeal is the validity of an Act passed at the 1938 Regular Session of the General Assembly of Kentucky, undertaking to create a new judicial district composed of the counties of Muhlenberg, Ohio, Butler and Edmonson, and to be known as the Thirty-Eighth Judicial District. Acts 1938, c. 13. section 10. The four counties named were part of the Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Judicial Districts, which, up to the present time, according to the allegations of the petition, have remained unchanged from their creation at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scotten v. LongfellowIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Zimmerman v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Scott v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Benson v. BaconIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Brown v. MossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holsclaw v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  2. Runyon, Commonwealth's Attorney v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Willis v. JonsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Kentucky Tax Commission v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Cornett v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API