Legal Opinion
Fried v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGoldrick, J.
Plaintiff was injured as the result of an accident in the operation of an automobile owned by Emma Stone and Herbert S. Spitz. At the time the car was being operated by a person by the name of Murray, who may have been employed by the owners thereof. Defendant issued and delivered a policy of casualty insurance wherein it indemnified Stone and Spitz against loss from liability for damages as a result of the ownership, maintenance, control and use of this automobile on account of bodily injuries suffered by third persons. ■ An action was brought by plaintiff against the owners of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Whitney v. Employers Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dominguez v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Michigan Alkali Co. v. Bankers Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Garland v. Audubon Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Rikowski v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Wilson v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.