Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fleming v. Moberly Milk Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 5, 1947No. 9475Published

1DissentEdgerton, Associate Justice

(dissenting) .

I think the judgment should be reversed for three reasons, each independent of the other two.

1. The District Court had no jurisdiction to review the Administrator’s order. The Administrator’s authority to ration sugar is derived from § 301 of the Second War Powers Act, 56 Stat. 177, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 633. This, same section as amended, 58 Stat. 827, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 633, provides that “The district courts of the United States are hereby given exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin or set aside, in whole or in part, any order suspending any priority or allocation * * * This *272…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API