Legal Opinion

Usher v. Gwynn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1964No. 14165PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This is a will contest in which Mrs. Ruth Lawton Gwynn and Mrs. Fred J. Ashley, as proponents, offered a holographic instrument, dated August 7, 1961, for probate as the last will and testament of Howard S. Cunningham. Kate Howard Usher, niece of testator, contested the instrument on the grounds of want of testamentary capacity and undue influence allegedly exercised on testator by proponents.

The case was tried before a jury and all issues, except that of revocation, were answered favorably to proponents. 1 The trial court sustained proponents’ motion to disregard the jury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cartwright v. CanodeTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brackenridge v. Roberts and McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McElroy v. Phink, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ashley v. UsherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Farr v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Matter of Estate of PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Stewart v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API