Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Usher

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1964No. A-10069PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Justice.

The holographic will of Howard S. Cunningham dated August 7,1961, was admitted to probate by the Aransas County Court. On appeal to the district court by contestant, Kate Howard Usher, the jury found that the testator possessed testamentary capacity; that in executing the will he was not acting under undue influence; that he signed the will offered for probate with the intent that the same should be his last will and testament. The following issue was also submitted and answered:

“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Exhibit P-1 (the will in question) had not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brackenridge v. Roberts and McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McElroy v. Phink, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Patton v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Reynolds v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Nelson v. First Northwestern Trust Co. of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Farr v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Marek v. Baylor CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API