Legal Opinion

Wilde, State Ex. v. Richards

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936No. 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtRinee, Justice

The Riverton State Bank, subsequently herein usually referred to as the “Bank,” was on the 31st of May, 1932, and prior thereto, engaged in conducting a banking business in the Town of Riverton, Wyoming, having been authorized so to do under the banking laws of this commonwealth. For several years prior to August 19, 1932, this institution operated a savings department as well as the usual commercial banking business, such department being installed pursuant to the provisions of Section 10-130 W. R. S. 1931.

On the date first above mentioned, the defendant and respondent, R. D. Richards, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Fire & Water Commissioners v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sherwood v. Central Michigan Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ledyard v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Peters v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API