Legal Opinion

Edson & Hamm, Inc. v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1926No. 1386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHightower, C. J.

This controversy arose from the following facts: .

On or about July 21, 1924, the appellant, Edson & Hamm, Inc., automobile dealers in the city 'of Beaumont, sold and delivered to appellee, H. B. Murray, a Gardner coupé automobile, at the agreed price of $950, to be paid as follows:

“Appellee was the owner of a Star, touring car, and appellant agreed to take appellee’s car as part payment for the Gardner coupé, and to allow appellee for his car $350 and the balance of the purchase money for the Gardner coupé, to wit, $600, was to be evidenced by appellee’s eleven promissory notes in the amount…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grogan v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J.M. Hollis Construction Co. v. Paul Durham Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Brazell v. GaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Mason v. Rockwall County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. David v. Quartaro v. Strategic Outsourcing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. French v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API