Helwig v. Warren State Bank
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The paramount question in this case is whether or not the title and rights of the Warren State Bank in the automobile in controversy are superior to those of the plaintiff in error.
The basis of the bank’s claim is its full compliance with the Automobile Sale and Transfer Act, being Sections 6310-3 to 6310-14, inclusive, General Code. It is conceded that, immediately upon receiving the bill of sale, the bank filed the same, according to Section 6310-10, General Code, as one “to whom title has in any manner been passed to a motor vehicle.” This was notice to the world of its rights…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. SchreyerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Automobile Finance Co. v. MundayOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Jaqua v. Reinhard, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Rutledge v. Trautman, AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Commercial Credit Co. v. SchreyerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.