Taylor v. Roniger
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalkaska; Chittenden, J. Bill by Henry Taylor against Hattie M. Roniger to establish an equitable assignment of a mortgage, to foreclose the same, and to enjoin an action at law. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.
James L. Taylor and Hattie M. Taylor, his wife, on May 21, 1883, became jointly seised as husband and wife of 40 acres of land in Kalkaska county. At the time there was a mortgage of $100 upon this land bearing interest at the rate of 10 percent., which they by stipulation in the deed to them assumed and agreed to pay. These parties were divorced January 18, 1889. On January 23, 1889, said James L. Taylor con*101veyed these premises by warranty deed to Henry Taylor, complainant in this suit. Hattie M. Taylor did not join in said conveyance. Complainant went into possession of said premises,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Stroh v. O'HearnMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re TomsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Detroit & Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. OramMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Morrison v. SemerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Shorebank Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.