Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Constanzo v. Robinson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prohibition by the State, on the relation of Frank Constanzo, against Hon. Alan H. Robinson, Judge, etc.

1Opinion of the Court

Millee, Judge: .

By rule awarded on October 13, ,1920, respondent was summoned to appear here and show cause why he should hot be prohibited from proceeding to try petitioner upon his appeal from a judgment of the police court of the City of Wheeling, upon a warrant of arrest issued July 6, 1920, charging him with a violation, on June 26, 1920, of sections 3 and 4 of an ordinance of said city, passed April 6, 1920, relating to traffic on streets, alleys and highways of said city, hut repealed or revoked, without savings or reservations respecting pending prosecutions, by an ordinance passed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Judy v. LashleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Morley v. GodfreyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bissett v. Town of LittletonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Block v. CrockettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Charleston v. HutchinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ash v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. City of Ashland v. Ashland Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Chittum v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API