Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Huttler

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

Respondent appearing specially moves to set aside a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that this court does not have jurisdiction over the child — the subject matter of this writ — or over respondent. This motion is denied, and the matter will be heard on the merits.

Upon the stipulated facts, the question is presented whether this court has jurisdiction to modify the custodial provisions of a foreign divorce decree when both the father and mother of the child are physically within this jurisdiction, but the child is not.

The parties were married in 1954 in California…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Langerman v. LangermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. In Re the Application for Letters of Guardianship of the Person & Property of ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. In Re the Appointment of a General Guardian of HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. In Re Proving the Will of DaggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hood v. MunroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Chase v. ChaseNew York City Family Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API