Legal Opinion

Hood v. Munroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act to obtain reasonable visitation, the appeals are from four orders of the Family Court, Dutchess County, as follows: (1) an order dated February 14, 1977 which, inter alia, directed appellant to produce the infant son of the parties for examination by a psychiatrist and/or physician; (2) an order dated May 6, 1977 which, inter alia, granted the petitioner certain visitation rights; (3) an order dated August 10, 1977 which directed the appellant to produce the infant for visitation and permitted the petitioner to have the infant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Obey v. DeglingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Ebert v. EbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Katz v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Juan R. v. Necta V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People ex rel. Satti v. SattiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMahon v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. In re Melissa M.New York Family Court · 1979
  3. Bartlett v. HollenbeckNew York City Family Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API