Legal Opinion

Hull v. Chisholm

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Knox county.

1Opinion of the CourtChittenden, J.

The same question is involved in these two actions. They were argued together and will be disposed of together.

The actions were brought by George William Chisholm to recover possession of specific real estate, the title to which is determined by a construction of the will of Sarah Hutchinson. Sarah Hutchinson died on October 23, 1895, leaving a last will and testament which was duly probated. The will reads as follows:

“In the name of the benevolent father of all:—
“I, Sarah Hutchinson, of the City of Mount Vernon, Ohio, do make and publish this my last will and testament, viz.:
“Item 1st. I…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gill, Exrx. v. Leach, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Minor v. ShippleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Persinger v. BrittonOhio Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Trumbull v. StentzOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. In re Will of IlesMarion County Probate Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API