Thomas v. Saulsbury & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action is for personal injuries 'received by coming in collision with obstructions upon and across a public highway. The highway was in process of reconstruction under contract with the state highway department. The barrier complained of was placed across the road for the purpose of closing a section of the road to public travel, after obtaining an order to close from ttíe board of revenue of the county.
One who exercises the privilege of closing a public highway by the erection of barriers thereon owes the duty to the public to so construct same as to be readily seen at a safe distance by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Montgomery St. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Scoggins v. Atlantic & G. P. Cement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Rarden Mercantile Co. v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. HubbardAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Roth v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Danford v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Williams v. Tennessee River Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.