Legal Opinion
Seegrist v. Rapid City Police Department
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 23, 2021No. 5:19-cv-05009Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION DUSTIN SEEGRIST, CIV. 19-5009-JLV Plaintiff, ORDER vs. OFFICER DALTON GUSTAFSON, OFFICER MATTHEW HOWER/K-9 handler, OFFICER ZECHARIAH STRINGER, and OFFICER ALEXANDER KING at the Rapid City Police Department, in their individual capacities, and CITY OF RAPID CITY, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint “for fail[ing] to effectuate service as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and fail[ing] to seek leave of the Court to add parties as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 21.” (Docket 20).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ken Hammer v. The City of Osage Beach, Missouri, and Jim SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Kurka v. Iowa County, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Ellis v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Carol M. Sieg v. Keith E. KarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.