Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Ozmint

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 22, 2006No. 26153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to consider a post-conviction relief (PCR) order denying relief to petitioner, a death row inmate. We find the solicitor’s office violated Brady v. Maryland 1 when it suppressed certain evidence involving witness Jason Riddle (Jason), and that that office violated petitioner’s due process rights when it failed to correct misstatements made by Jason while testifying against petitioner. See Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959). The PCR order denying petitioner relief is reversed, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

FACTS/PROCEDUR…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Daniels v. Warden of Lee Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API