Legal Opinion

Sheils v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 10, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The petitioner seeks to recover from the Commonwealth the contract price which he claims is owed to him under four alleged contracts by each of which he was to make certain specified “Alterations and Repairs caused by hurricane ” at a named State armory. The total sum involved is over $17,000. It is conceded that the petitioner *536has fully performed the specified work. His good faith in securing the contracts and in carrying them out is not now attacked. The question is whether the contracts created legal liabilities against the Commonwealth. The answer depends-upon the authority of the officer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Continental Construction Co. v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Adams v. County of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Inhabitants of West Springfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Town of Concord v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Baker v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. FIN. COMM. OF FALMOUTH v. Falmouth Bd. of Pub. WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Kenyon Oil Co. v. CHIEF OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENTMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API